ASP.NET Core In Production – Graceful Shutdown And Reacting To Aborted Requests

In the previous post "ASP.NET Core in production: Take back control of your web app" I mentioned that getting hold if the dependency injection (DI) is just one step of many to improve the architecture of your web applications. Today well will look into 2 other aspects that are best explained together: graceful shutdown and reacting to aborted requests.

In diesem Artikel:

pg
Pawel Gerr ist Architekt und Consultant bei Thinktecture. Er hat sich auf .NET Core Backends spezialisiert und kennt Entity Framework von vorne bis hinten.
Image you are in the middle of handling of a web request. How do you know that the WebHost is about to shut down or that the client is not interested in the response anymore? Especially the latter will occur more often and without proper handling you end up wasting resources for nothing.
  1. If your component is interested in server shutdown only then you can inject IApplicationLifetime and use the property ApplicationStopping that is of type CancellationToken. Most of asynchronous operations support cancellation tokens so you just have to pass the token to them but be prepare for handling the OperationCanceledException and TaskCanceledException.
				
					public DemoController(IApplicationLifetime appLifetime)
{
    _appLifetime = appLifetime;
}
    
[HttpGet("MyAction")]
public async Task<IActionResult> MyAction()
{
    CancellationToken token = _appLifetime.ApplicationStopping;
    return await DoSomethingAsync(token);
}
				
			

Having a side-free operation like selecting data from database can be cancelled without much effort just pass the CancellationToken to asynchronous methods (like ToListAsync(token)) or check the property CancellationToken.IsCancellationRequested in case you are iterating over some collection or does other synchronous stuff. However, if the operation is critical, the server is shutting down and the component needs a few seconds more to finish then you can delay the shutdown by registering a callback with the CancellationToken.

Use this feature with care, don’t hold up the shutdown indefinitely!

				
					_appLifetime.ApplicationStopping.Register(() =>
{
    // server is not going to shutdown
    // until the callback is done
});
				
			

Note: you can delay the shutdown by overriding the method Dispose of the controller. Using IDisposable-components to finish some stuff works best if you decouple the DI from ASP.NET life cycle like suggested in my previous post because in most cases you want(!) to shut down the WebHost first so that the endpoints are closed and no new requests can come in. Afterwards you can stop your internal processes and dispose of components.

				
					public class DemoController: Controller
{
    protected override void Dispose(bool disposing)
    {
        base.Dispose(disposing);
        //finish your stuff synchronously
    }
}
				
			
  1. Being interested in server shutdown only is more of an edge case. Most of the time it doesn’t matter whether the operation has to stop because of the shutdown or because the client has aborted the HTTP request (e.g. by navigating to another page). In both cases you can use HttpContext.RequestAborted which is another CancellationToken. Although it is called “request-aborted” it is cancelled on shutdown as well because in this case the request is aborted by the server itself not the client.
				
					[HttpGet("MyAction")]
public async Task<IActionResult> MyAction()
{
    CancellationToken token = HttpContext.RequestAborted;
    return await DoSomethingAsync(token);
}
				
			

If the method happens to be an action of an MVC/Web API controller (like in my examples) then you can just specify a new method argument of type CancellationToken to get HttpContext.RequestAborted provided to you.

				
					[HttpGet("MyAction")]
public async Task<IActionResult> MyAction(CancellationToken token)
{
    return await DoSomethingAsync(token);
}
				
			

Want to try it out? I’ve updated the example from my previous post so that you are able to start and abort HTTP requests or restart the WebHost. The sources are available on Github.

Kostenloser
Newsletter

Aktuelle Artikel, Screencasts, Webinare und Interviews unserer Experten für Sie

Verpassen Sie keine Inhalte zu Angular, .NET Core, Blazor, Azure und Kubernetes und melden Sie sich zu unserem kostenlosen monatlichen Dev-Newsletter an.

Newsletter Anmeldung
Diese Artikel könnten Sie interessieren
Database Access with Sessions
.NET
KP-round

Data Access in .NET Native AOT with Sessions

.NET 8 brings Native AOT to ASP.NET Core, but many frameworks and libraries rely on unbound reflection internally and thus cannot support this scenario yet. This is true for ORMs, too: EF Core and Dapper will only bring full support for Native AOT in later releases. In this post, we will implement a database access layer with Sessions using the Humble Object pattern to get a similar developer experience. We will use Npgsql as a plain ADO.NET provider targeting PostgreSQL.
15.11.2023
Old computer with native code
.NET
KP-round

Native AOT with ASP.NET Core – Overview

Originally introduced in .NET 7, Native AOT can be used with ASP.NET Core in the upcoming .NET 8 release. In this post, we look at the benefits and drawbacks from a general perspective and perform measurements to quantify the improvements on different platforms.
02.11.2023
ASP.NET Core
favicon

Architektur-Modernisierung: Migration von WCF zu gRPC mit ASP.NET Core – ein pragmatischer Ansatz

Viele Projekte mit verteilten Anwendungen in der .NET-Welt basieren noch auf der Windows Communication Foundation (WCF). Doch wie kommt man weg von der "Altlast" und wie stellt man seinen Code auf sowohl moderne als auch zukunftssichere Beine? Eine mögliche Lösung ist gRPC.

13.04.2023
Blazor
favicon

gRPC Code-First mit ASP.NET Core 7 und Blazor WebAssembly

Wie in allen anderen browserbasierten Single-Page-Application (SPA) Frameworks, ist Blazor WebAssembly JSON-over-HTTP (über Web- oder REST-APIs) die bei weitem häufigste Methode, um Daten auszutauschen und serverseitige Vorgänge auszulösen. Der Client sendet eine HTTP-Anfrage mit JSON-Daten an eine URL, mitunter über unterschiedliche HTTP-Verben. Anschließend führt der Server eine Operation aus und antwortet mit einem HTTP-Statuscode und den resultierenden JSON-Daten. Warum sollte man das ändern? Nun, es gibt Gründe - vor allem wenn man in einem geschlossenen System ist und .NET sowohl im Frontend als auch im Backend einsetzt.
30.03.2023
Blazor
favicon

Blazor WebAssembly in .NET 7: UI-Performance-Optimierung auf Komponentenebene

Stockende UI, keine Reaktion nach dem Klick auf einen Button oder einer Eingabe in einem Feld - dies sind nur wenige Beispiele alltäglicher Probleme, die der Nutzung von Client-Anwendungen im Allgemeinen, und bei Webanwendungen im Speziellen, immer wieder auftreten können. In diesem Artikel schauen wir uns an, wie wir komponentenbasierte UIs in Blazor WebAssembly optimieren können, um dadurch eine für die Benutzer zufriedenstellende Geschwindigkeit und ein flüssiges UI zu bekommen.
29.03.2023
Blazor
sg

Understanding and Controlling the Blazor WebAssembly Startup Process

There are a lot of things going on in the background, when a Blazor WebAssembly application is being started. In some cases you might want to take a bit more control over that process. One example might be the wish to display a loading screen for applications that take some time for initial preparation, or when users are on a slow internet connection. However, in order to control something, we need to understand what is happening first. This article takes you down the rabbit hole of how a Blazor WASM application starts up.
07.03.2023