Entity Framework Core Migrations – Assembly Version Mismatch

If you have switched your .NET Core project from xproj to csproj (MSBuild) and updated the nuget packages then you may run into an issue when executing some of the dotnet ef-commands.

In this article:

pg
Pawel Gerr is architect consultant at Thinktecture. He focuses on backends with .NET Core and knows Entity Framework inside out.
I got the following error after executing dotnet ef migrations list:
				
					Could not load file or assembly 'Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore, Version=1.1.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=adb9793829ddae60' or one of its dependencies. The located assembly's manifest definition does not match the assembly reference. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80131040)

				
			

The problem is that some of my (3rd party) dependencies are using version 1.1.0 and the others version 1.1.1. In a classic .NET 4.6 project we use assembly redirects to solve this kind of problems and the in .NET Core we do the same …

Just create an app.config file with the following content:

				
					<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

<configuration>
    <runtime>
        <assemblyBinding xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:asm.v1">
            <dependentAssembly>
                <assemblyIdentity name="Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore" culture="neutral" publicKeyToken="adb9793829ddae60" />
                <bindingRedirect oldVersion="0.0.0.0-1.1.1.0" newVersion="1.1.1.0" />"
            </dependentAssembly>
            <dependentAssembly>
                <assemblyIdentity name="Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Relational" culture="neutral" publicKeyToken="adb9793829ddae60" />
                <bindingRedirect oldVersion="0.0.0.0-1.1.1.0" newVersion="1.1.1.0" />"
            </dependentAssembly>
            <dependentAssembly>
                <assemblyIdentity name="Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions" culture="neutral" publicKeyToken="adb9793829ddae60" />
                <bindingRedirect oldVersion="0.0.0.0-1.1.1.0" newVersion="1.1.1.0" />"
            </dependentAssembly>
        </assemblyBinding>
    </runtime>
</configuration>
				
			

If you still getting errors than make sure you have the following items in your csproj-file

				
					<ItemGroup>
    <PackageReference Include="Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Tools" Version="1.1.0">
        <PrivateAssets>All</PrivateAssets>
    </PackageReference>
    <DotNetCliToolReference Include="Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Tools.DotNet" Version="1.0.0" />
</ItemGroup>
				
			
Free
Newsletter

Current articles, screencasts and interviews by our experts

Don’t miss any content on Angular, .NET Core, Blazor, Azure, and Kubernetes and sign up for our free monthly dev newsletter.

EN Newsletter Anmeldung (#7)
Related Articles
Angular
SL-rund
If you previously wanted to integrate view transitions into your Angular application, this was only possible in a very cumbersome way that needed a lot of detailed knowledge about Angular internals. Now, Angular 17 introduced a feature to integrate the View Transition API with the router. In this two-part series, we will look at how to leverage the feature for route transitions and how we could use it for single-page animations.
15.04.2024
.NET
KP-round
.NET 8 brings Native AOT to ASP.NET Core, but many frameworks and libraries rely on unbound reflection internally and thus cannot support this scenario yet. This is true for ORMs, too: EF Core and Dapper will only bring full support for Native AOT in later releases. In this post, we will implement a database access layer with Sessions using the Humble Object pattern to get a similar developer experience. We will use Npgsql as a plain ADO.NET provider targeting PostgreSQL.
15.11.2023
.NET
KP-round
Originally introduced in .NET 7, Native AOT can be used with ASP.NET Core in the upcoming .NET 8 release. In this post, we look at the benefits and drawbacks from a general perspective and perform measurements to quantify the improvements on different platforms.
02.11.2023