Entity Framework Core – Improved Value Conversion Support

Entity Framework Core (EF) 2.1 introduced a new feature called Value Conversion. Now, we are able to map custom .NET types to a type the database understands and vice versa. This long-awaited feature is especially popular among software engineers following the domain driven design (DDD) patterns.

In this article:

pg
Pawel Gerr is architect consultant at Thinktecture. He focuses on backends with .NET Core and knows Entity Framework inside out.

At the moment the value conversion has some limitations that will be removed in the future. The limitation I want to address in this post is the fallback to client-side evaluation in some fairly simple but rather frequently needed use case.

As an example I will use an entity containing the property of type System.Drawing.Color:

				
					public class Product
{
   ...
   public Color Color { get; set; }
}
				
			

And the corresponding value conversion:

				
					modelBuilder.Entity<Product>()
            .Property(p => p.Color)
            .HasConversion(color => color.Name, name => Color.FromName(name));

				
			

With provided conversion, only the name of the color is saved and when the name comes back from the database then it is mapped to an instance of Color.

Having the converter we are now able to insert, update and select the property Color.

				
					DemoDbContext ctx = ...;

// adding new product
ctx.Products.Add(new Product { ..., Color = Color.Green});
ctx.SaveChanges();

// retrieving all products
var products = await ctx.Products.ToListAsync();
				
			

In both cases we get the expected results. Now let us fetch all products with the color Green.

				
					var products = await ctx.Products
                        .Where(p => p.Color == Color.Green)
                        .ToListAsync();
				
			

This time the result is correct as well but EF emits a warning: _The LINQ expression where ([p].Color == __Green_0) could not be translated and will be evaluated locally._

A look at the SQL statement proves that the filtering is done in memory and not in the database:

				
					SELECT ..., [p].[Color]
FROM [Products] AS [p]

				
			

When having just a few products in the database then there is nothing to worry about but with a lot of records this query may lead to major performance issues.

Implement the "IRelationalTypeMappingSourcePlugin"

The provided value converter is applied to the property Color only so the constant value on the right side of the equation is not being converted. What we need is kind of global value converter, so let’s build one.

To provide EF with the value converter for Color we have to implement the interface IRelationalTypeMappingSourcePlugin that has just 1 method FindMapping. First, we prepare the mapping that will be returned by the plugin. The type mapping is derived from RelationalTypeMapping and is providing the CLR type and the converter to the base class.

Actually, the store type nvarchar(50) is not being used in this case so you can even write rumpelstilzchen if you want to.

				
					public class ColorTypeMapping : RelationalTypeMapping
{
   private static readonly ValueConverter<Color, string> _converter
      = new ValueConverter<Color, string>(color => color.Name,
                                          name => Color.FromName(name));

   public ColorTypeMapping()
      : base(new RelationalTypeMappingParameters(
                   new CoreTypeMappingParameters(typeof(Color), _converter),
                   "nvarchar(50)"))
   {
   }
}
				
			

The plugin itself is just waiting for the method to be called with the CLR type Color to return previously implemented ColorTypeMapping.

				
					public class ColorTypeMappingPlugin : IRelationalTypeMappingSourcePlugin
{
   public RelationalTypeMapping FindMapping(in RelationalTypeMappingInfo mappingInfo)
   {
      if (mappingInfo.ClrType == typeof(Color))
         return new ColorTypeMapping();

      return null;
   }
}
				
			

Register the plugin with dependency injection

Now, we have to register the ColorTypeMappingPlugin with the (internal) dependency injection (DI) of EF. For that we have to implement IDbContextOptionsExtension like I did in one of my previous blogs (EF Core: Custom Functions – search for the first occurrence of IDbContextOptionsExtension) or use the nuget package Thinktecture.EntityFrameworkCore.Relational (docs).

By using the nuget package the registration of the plugin looks as following:

				
					services
   .AddDbContext<DemoDbContext>(builder => builder
                        ...
                        .AddRelationalTypeMappingSourcePlugin<ColorTypeMappingPlugin>()
				
			

Trying out the plugin

Let’s look at the SQL statements when we query for products with the color Green:

				
					// having the value `Color.Green` inline we get the SQL
//    SELECT ..., [p].[Color]
//    FROM [Products] AS [p]
//    WHERE [p].[Color] = @__Green_0

var products = await ctx.Products
                        .Where(p => p.Color == Color.Green)
                        .ToListAsync();

// but more often the filter comes via parameter
//    SELECT ..., [p].[Color]
//    FROM [Products] AS [p]
//    WHERE [p].[Color] = @__color_0

var color = Color.Green;
var products = await ctx.Products
                        .Where(p => p.Color == color)
                        .ToListAsync();
				
			

With less than 20 lines of code we were able to improve the usability of the value conversion so the EF model can be as close as possible to our domain model without loosing performance. It is just a matter of time until EF team removes the limitation for this rather simple use cases. Still, there will be some edge cases in the future that will require some tweaking once again.

Free
Newsletter

Current articles, screencasts and interviews by our experts

Don’t miss any content on Angular, .NET Core, Blazor, Azure, and Kubernetes and sign up for our free monthly dev newsletter.

EN Newsletter Anmeldung (#7)
Related Articles
AI
sg
One of the more pragmatic ways to get going on the current AI hype, and to get some value out of it, is by leveraging semantic search. This is, in itself, a relatively simple concept: You have a bunch of documents and want to find the correct one based on a given query. The semantic part now allows you to find the correct document based on the meaning of its contents, in contrast to simply finding words or parts of words in it like we usually do with lexical search. In our last projects, we gathered some experience with search bots, and with this article, I'd love to share our insights with you.
17.05.2024
Angular
sl_300x300
If you previously wanted to integrate view transitions into your Angular application, this was only possible in a very cumbersome way that needed a lot of detailed knowledge about Angular internals. Now, Angular 17 introduced a feature to integrate the View Transition API with the router. In this two-part series, we will look at how to leverage the feature for route transitions and how we could use it for single-page animations.
15.04.2024
.NET
kp_300x300
.NET 8 brings Native AOT to ASP.NET Core, but many frameworks and libraries rely on unbound reflection internally and thus cannot support this scenario yet. This is true for ORMs, too: EF Core and Dapper will only bring full support for Native AOT in later releases. In this post, we will implement a database access layer with Sessions using the Humble Object pattern to get a similar developer experience. We will use Npgsql as a plain ADO.NET provider targeting PostgreSQL.
15.11.2023