Entity Framework Core 3.0 – “Hidden” GROUP BY Capabilities (Part 2)

In the previous blog post we used a navigational property to work around the limitations of the extension method GroupBy. The problem is, there is not always such a property we can use for grouping. Especially, when following domain driven design practices, a bidirectional navigation is undesirable to not to pollute the domain model (too much). Besides not introducing a navigational property intentionally there might be use cases when we have to group data by property such as the name of a record. In this case there simply cannot be a navigational property.

In diesem Artikel:

pg
Pawel Gerr ist Architekt und Consultant bei Thinktecture. Er hat sich auf .NET Core Backends spezialisiert und kennt Entity Framework von vorne bis hinten.

In this post we look at LINQ queries that behave in the same way as the navigational property we used in the previous post:

				
					var firstProducts = Context.ProductGroups  
   .Select(g => g.Products.OrderBy(p => p.Name).FirstOrDefault())  
   .ToList();
				
			

Let’s achieve the same without using the property Products. Yet again, we start from the product groups but instead of using the navigational property we use the DbSet Products. The join condition between a group and the products is specified inside of the extension method FirstOrDefault.

				
					var firstProducts = Context.ProductGroups  
   .Select(g => Context.Products  
       .OrderBy(p => p.Name)  
       .FirstOrDefault(p => p.GroupId == g.Id))  
   .ToList();
				
			

The generated SQL looks like the following:

				
					SELECT [t0].*  
FROM  
   ProductGroups AS p  
   LEFT JOIN  
   (  
      SELECT *  
      FROM  
      (  
         SELECT *, ROW_NUMBER() OVER(PARTITION BY p0.GroupId ORDER BY p0.Name) AS row  
         FROM [Products] AS [p0]  
      ) AS [t]  
      WHERE [t].[row] <= 1  
   ) AS t0 ON p.Id = t0.GroupId
				
			

The SQL statement is identical to the one that was generated when using the navigational property.

Now, imagine there is no DbSet ProductGroups and the property GroupId is just a regular property like Name. As a replacement for missing ProductGroups we use SELECT DISTINCT GroupId on the Products. The 2nd part of the query stays the same.

				
					var firstProducts = Context.Products  
   .Select(p => p.GroupId)  
   .Distinct()  
   .Select(id => Context.Products  
        .OrderBy(p => p.Name)  
        .FirstOrDefault(p => p.GroupId == id))  
   .ToList();

				
			

The generated SQL statement is:

				
					 SELECT [t1].*  
    FROM  
    (  
       SELECT DISTINCT p.GroupId  
       FROM Products AS p  
    ) AS t  
    LEFT JOIN (  
        SELECT t0.*  
        FROM (  
            SELECT p0.*, ROW_NUMBER() OVER(PARTITION BY p0.GroupId ORDER BY p0.Name) AS row  
            FROM Products AS p0  
        ) AS t0  
        WHERE t0.row <= 1  
    ) AS t1 ON t.GroupId = t1.GroupId
				
			

For grouping of data using built-in capabilities of Entity Framework Core 3.0 should be enough for most cases. For more advanced use cases we can’t do much but extending EF with custom functionality.

Demos: NavigationPropertiesAlternativeQueriesDemo.cs

Kostenloser
Newsletter

Aktuelle Artikel, Screencasts, Webinare und Interviews unserer Experten für Sie

Verpassen Sie keine Inhalte zu Angular, .NET Core, Blazor, Azure und Kubernetes und melden Sie sich zu unserem kostenlosen monatlichen Dev-Newsletter an.

Newsletter Anmeldung
Diese Artikel könnten Sie interessieren
.NET
pg

Advanced Value Object Patterns in .NET

While basic value objects solve primitive obsession, complex domain requirements need sophisticated modeling techniques. This article explores advanced patterns using Thinktecture.Runtime.Extensions to tackle real-world scenarios: open-ended dates for employment contracts, composite file identifiers across storage systems, recurring anniversaries without year components, and geographical jurisdictions using discriminated unions.
19.10.2025
.NET
pg

Discriminated Unions in .NET: Modeling States and Variants

Domain models often involve concepts that exist in multiple distinct states or variations. Traditional approaches using enums and nullable properties can lead to invalid states and scattered logic. This article explores how discriminated unions provide a structured, type-safe way to model domain variants in .NET, aligning perfectly with Domain-Driven Design principles while enforcing invariants at the type level.
06.10.2025
.NET
pg

Smart Enums in .NET: Integration with Frameworks and Libraries

Learn how to seamlessly integrate Smart Enums with essential .NET frameworks and libraries. This article covers practical solutions for JSON serialization, ASP.NET Core model binding for both Minimal APIs and MVC controllers, and Entity Framework Core persistence using value converters. Discover how Thinktecture.Runtime.Extensions provides dedicated packages to eliminate integration friction and maintain type safety across your application stack.
21.09.2025
.NET
pg

Value Objects in .NET: Enhancing Business Semantics

Value objects are fundamental building blocks in Domain-Driven Design, serving far more than simple data wrappers. This article explores their strategic importance in bridging technical code and business concepts, enforcing domain rules, and fostering clearer communication with domain experts. Learn how to build robust aggregates, cultivate ubiquitous language, and encapsulate domain-specific behavior using Thinktecture.Runtime.Extensions in .NET applications.
16.09.2025
.NET
pg

Pattern Matching with Discriminated Unions in .NET

Traditional C# pattern matching with switch statements and if/else chains is error-prone and doesn't guarantee exhaustive handling of all cases. When you add new types or states, it's easy to miss updating conditional logic, leading to runtime bugs. The library Thinktecture.Runtime.Extensions solves this with built-in Switch and Map methods for discriminated unions that enforce compile-time exhaustiveness checking.
26.08.2025
.NET
pg

Value Objects in .NET: Integration with Frameworks and Libraries

Value Objects in .NET provide a structured way to improve consistency and maintainability in domain modeling. This article examines their integration with popular frameworks and libraries, highlighting best practices for seamless implementation. From working with Entity Framework to leveraging their advantages in ASP.NET, we explore how Value Objects can be effectively incorporated into various architectures. By understanding their role in framework integration, developers can optimize data handling and enhance code clarity without unnecessary complexity.
12.08.2025