Entity Framework Core – Changing DB Migration Schema At Runtime

In the first part of this short blog post series we looked at how to change the database schema of a DbContext, now it is all about changing the schema of the EF Core Migrations at runtime. The samples are on Github: PawelGerr/EntityFrameworkCore-Demos

In diesem Artikel:

pg
Pawel Gerr ist Architekt und Consultant bei Thinktecture. Er hat sich auf .NET Core Backends spezialisiert und kennt Entity Framework von vorne bis hinten.
Given is a DemoDbContext implementing our interface IDbContextSchema from the first part of this series.
				
					public interface IDbContextSchema
{
  string Schema { get; }
}

public class DemoDbContext : DbContext, IDbContextSchema
{
 public string Schema { get; }

 public DbSet<Product> Products { get; set; }

 ...
}
				
			

At first we create a migration the usual way: dotnet ef migrations add Initial_Migration

And we get the following:

				
					public partial class Initial_Migration : Migration
{
  protected override void Up(MigrationBuilder migrationBuilder)
  {
    migrationBuilder.CreateTable("Products",
                        table => new { Id = table.Column<Guid>() },
                        constraints: table => table.PrimaryKey("PK_Products", x => x.Id));
  }

  protected override void Down(MigrationBuilder migrationBuilder)
  {
    migrationBuilder.DropTable("Products");
  }
}
				
			

Next, we add a constructor to provide the migration with IDbContextSchema and pass the schema to CreateTable and DropTable.

				
					public partial class Initial_Migration : Migration
{
  private readonly IDbContextSchema _schema;

  public Initial_Migration(IDbContextSchema schema)
  {
    _schema = schema ?? throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(schema));
  }

  protected override void Up(MigrationBuilder migrationBuilder)
  {
    migrationBuilder.CreateTable("Products",
                        table => new { Id = table.Column<Guid>() },
                        constraints: table => table.PrimaryKey("PK_Products", x => x.Id),
                        schema: _schema.Schema);
  }

  protected override void Down(MigrationBuilder migrationBuilder)
  {
    migrationBuilder.DropTable("Products", _schema.Schema);
  }
}
				
			

If we try to run the migration then we get a MissingMethodException: No parameterless constructor defined for this object. because EF Core needs a parameterless constructor to be able to create an instance of the migration. Luckily, we can adjust the part that is responsible for the creation of new instances. For that we derive from MigrationsAssembly and override the method CreateMigration. In CreateMigration we check if the migration requires an instance of IDbContextSchema and whether the current DbContext is implementing this interface. If so, then we create new instance of the migration by ourselves and return this instance to the caller, otherwise we pass the call to the default implementation.

				
					public class DbSchemaAwareMigrationAssembly : MigrationsAssembly
{
  private readonly DbContext _context;

  public DbSchemaAwareMigrationAssembly(ICurrentDbContext currentContext, 
        IDbContextOptions options, IMigrationsIdGenerator idGenerator, 
        IDiagnosticsLogger<DbLoggerCategory.Migrations> logger)
    : base(currentContext, options, idGenerator, logger)
  {
    _context = currentContext.Context;
  }

  public override Migration CreateMigration(TypeInfo migrationClass, 
        string activeProvider)
  {
    if (activeProvider == null)
      throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(activeProvider));

    var hasCtorWithSchema = migrationClass
            .GetConstructor(new[] { typeof(IDbContextSchema) }) != null;

    if (hasCtorWithSchema && _context is IDbContextSchema schema)
    {
      var instance = (Migration)Activator.CreateInstance(migrationClass.AsType(), schema);
      instance.ActiveProvider = activeProvider;
      return instance;
    }

    return base.CreateMigration(migrationClass, activeProvider);
  }
}
				
			

The last step is to register the DbSchemaAwareMigrationAssembly with the dependency injection of EF Core.

Remarks: to change the schema (or the table name) of the migration history table you have to use the method MigrationsHistoryTable

				
					var optionsBuilder = new DbContextOptionsBuilder<DemoDbContext>()
              .UseSqlServer("..."
                      // optional
                      //, b => b.MigrationsHistoryTable("__EFMigrationsHistory", schema)
                            )
              .ReplaceService<IModelCacheKeyFactory, DbSchemaAwareModelCacheKeyFactory>()
              .ReplaceService<IMigrationsAssembly, DbSchemaAwareMigrationAssembly>();
				
			

That’s all!

Kostenloser
Newsletter

Aktuelle Artikel, Screencasts, Webinare und Interviews unserer Experten für Sie

Verpassen Sie keine Inhalte zu Angular, .NET Core, Blazor, Azure und Kubernetes und melden Sie sich zu unserem kostenlosen monatlichen Dev-Newsletter an.

Newsletter Anmeldung
Diese Artikel könnten Sie interessieren
.NET
pg

Pattern Matching with Discriminated Unions in .NET

Traditional C# pattern matching with switch statements and if/else chains is error-prone and doesn't guarantee exhaustive handling of all cases. When you add new types or states, it's easy to miss updating conditional logic, leading to runtime bugs. The library Thinktecture.Runtime.Extensions solves this with built-in Switch and Map methods for discriminated unions that enforce compile-time exhaustiveness checking.
26.08.2025
.NET
pg

Value Objects in .NET: Integration with Frameworks and Libraries

Value Objects in .NET provide a structured way to improve consistency and maintainability in domain modeling. This article examines their integration with popular frameworks and libraries, highlighting best practices for seamless implementation. From working with Entity Framework to leveraging their advantages in ASP.NET, we explore how Value Objects can be effectively incorporated into various architectures. By understanding their role in framework integration, developers can optimize data handling and enhance code clarity without unnecessary complexity.
12.08.2025
.NET
pg

Smart Enums: Adding Domain Logic to Enumerations in .NET

This article builds upon the introduction of Smart Enums by exploring their powerful capability to encapsulate behavior, a significant limitation of traditional C# enums. We delve into how Thinktecture.Runtime.Extensions enables embedding domain-specific logic directly within Smart Enum definitions. This co-location of data and behavior promotes more cohesive, object-oriented, and maintainable code, moving beyond scattered switch statements and extension methods. Discover techniques to make your enumerations truly "smart" by integrating behavior directly where it belongs.
29.07.2025
.NET
pg

Discriminated Unions: Representation of Alternative Types in .NET

Representing values that may take on multiple distinct types or states is a common challenge in C#. Traditional approaches—like tuples, generics, or exceptions—often lead to clumsy and error-prone code. Discriminated unions address these issues by enabling clear, type-safe modeling of “one-of” alternatives. This article examines pitfalls of conventional patterns and introduces discriminated unions with the Thinktecture.Runtime.Extensions library, demonstrating how they enhance code safety, prevent invalid states, and improve maintainability—unlocking powerful domain modeling in .NET with minimal boilerplate.
15.07.2025
.NET
pg

Handling Complexity: Introducing Complex Value Objects in .NET

While simple value objects wrap single primitives, many domain concepts involve multiple related properties (e.g., a date range's start and end). This article introduces Complex Value Objects in .NET, which group these properties into a cohesive unit. This ensures internal consistency, centralizes validation, and encapsulates behavior. Discover how to implement these for clearer, safer code using the library Thinktecture.Runtime.Extensions, which minimizes boilerplate when handling such related data.
01.07.2025
.NET
pg

Smart Enums: Beyond Traditional Enumerations in .NET

Traditional C# enums often fall short when needing to associate data or behavior with constants, or ensure strong type safety. This article explores the "Smart Enum" pattern as a superior alternative. Leveraging the library Thinktecture.Runtime.Extensions and Roslyn Source Generators, developers can easily implement Smart Enums. These provide a robust, flexible, and type-safe way to represent fixed sets of related options, encapsulating both data and behavior directly within the Smart Enum. This results in more maintainable, expressive, and resilient C# code, overcoming the limitations of basic enums.
17.06.2025